Publication

Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Total Body Irradiation Pretransplant Conditioning for Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Partow Kebriaei, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterClaudio Anasetti, Moffitt Cancer CenterMei-Jie Zhang, Medical College of WisconsinHai-Lin Wang, Medical College of WisconsinIbrahim Aldoss, City of Hope National Medical CenterMarcos de Lima, University Hospitals Case Medical CenterHanna Khoury, Emory UniversityBrenda M. Sandmaier, University of WashingtonMary M. Horowitz, Medical College of WisconsinAndrew Artz, The University of ChicagoNelli Bejanyan, University of Minnesota Medical Center, FairviewStefan Ciurea, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHillard M. Lazarus, University Hospitals Case Medical CenterRobert Peter Gale, Imperial College LondonMark Litzow, Mayo ClinicChristopher Bredeson, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteMatthew D. Seftel, CancerCare ManitobaMichael A. Pulsipher, USC Keck School of MedicineJaap-Jan Boelens, University Medical Center UtrechtMuna Qayed, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-04-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1083-8791
Volume
  • 24
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 726
End Page
  • 733
Grant/Funding Information
  • See publication for full funding statement.
Abstract
  • Total body irradiation (TBI) has been included in standard conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Non-TBI regimens have incorporated busulfan (Bu) to decrease toxicity. This retrospective study analyzed TBI and Bu on outcomes of ALL patients 18–60 years old, in first or second complete remission (CR), undergoing HLA-compatible sibling, related, or unrelated donor HCT, who reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research from 2005 to 2014. TBI plus etoposide (25%) or cyclophosphamide (75%) was used in 819 patients, and intravenous Bu plus fludarabine (41%), clofarabine (30%), cyclophosphamide (15%), or melphalan (13%) was used in 299 patients. Bu-containing regimens were analyzed together, since no significant differences for patient outcomes were noted between them. Bu patients were older, with better performance status; took longer to achieve first CR and receive HCT; were treated more recently; and were more likely to receive peripheral blood grafts, antithymocyte globulin, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. With median follow-up of 3.6 years for Bu and 5.3 years for TBI, adjusted 3-year outcomes showed treatment-related mortality Bu 19% versus TBI 25% (P =.04); relapse Bu 37% versus TBI 28% (P =.007); disease-free survival (DFS) Bu 45% versus TBI 48% (P =.35); and overall survival (OS) Bu 57% versus TBI 53% (P =.35). In multivariate analysis, Bu patients had higher risk of relapse (relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.85; P =.002) compared with TBI patients. Despite the higher relapse, Bu-containing conditioning led to similar OS and DFS following HCT for ALL.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Pharmacology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items