Publication

EGFR expression and survival in patients given cetuximab and chernoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A secondary analysis of RTOG 0324

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ritsuko Komaki, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterRebecca Paulus, RTOG Statistical CenterGeorge R. Blumenschein, Jr., University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterWalter J Curran, Emory UniversityFrancisco Robert, University of AlabamaJuliette Thariat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterMaria Werner-Wasik, Thomas Jefferson UniversityHak Choy, University of Texas SouthwesternFred R. Hirsch, University of ColoradoK. Kian Ang, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-07-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0167-8140
Volume
  • 112
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 30
End Page
  • 36
Grant/Funding Information
  • Supported by grants RTOG U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA37422, Stat U10 CA32115, P01 CA06294, and P30 CA016672 from the National Cancer Institute.
Abstract
  • Purpose: We investigated whether expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was associated with survival and disease control in this secondary analysis of a phase II trial of cetuximab + chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients received cetuximab weekly before and during radiation (63 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks) with weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel. We analyzed EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in pretreatment biopsy specimens and compared findings with overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) and time to progression (TTP). Results: Specimens for IHC and FISH were collected from 51 and 45 of 87 evaluable patients. Pretreatment characteristics did not differ for patients with (n = 51) or without (n = 36) EGFR IHC data, or with (n = 45) or without (n = 42) FISH data. However, patients without IHC data had worse OS (HR = 1.63, P = 0.05), worse PFS (HR = 1.88, P = 0.008), and worse TTP [HR = 1.99, P = 0.01] than those with IHC data. EGFR protein expression was not related to pretreatment characteristics or OS; FISH-positive disease was associated with better performance status but not with OS, PFS, or TTP. Conclusions: Surprisingly, outcomes differed not by EGFR expression but by the availability of samples for analysis, underscoring the importance of obtaining biopsy samples in such trials.
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author: Ritsuko Komaki, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX. Tel 713-563-2300; FAX 713-563-2331; rkomaki@mdanderson.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items