Publication

Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: ELOQUENT-2 follow-up and post-hoc analyses on progression-free survival and tumour growth

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Meletios A. Dimopoulos, University of AthensSagar Lonial, Emory UniversityDarrell White, Dalhousie UniversityPhilippe Moreau, University HospitalAntonio Palumbo, University of TorinoJesus San-Miguel, Clinica Universidad de NavarraOfer Shpilberg, Assuta Medical CentersKenneth Anderson, Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteSebastian Grosicki, Medical University of SilesiaIvan Spicka, Charles UniversityAdam Walter-Croneck, Medical University of LublinHila Magen, Rabin Medical CenterMaria‐Victoria Mateos, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaAndrew Belch, University of AlbertaDonna Reece, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreMeral Beksac, Ankara UniversityEric Bleickardt, Bristol-Myers SquibbValerie Poulart, Bristol-Myers SquibbJennifer Sheng, Bristol-Myers SquibbOumar Sy, Bristol-Myers SquibbJessica Katz, Bristol-Myers SquibbAnil Singhal, AbbVie Biotherapeut IncPaul Richardson, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-09-01
Publisher
  • Wiley: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0007-1048
Volume
  • 178
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 896
End Page
  • 905
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb in collaboration with AbbVie Biotherapeutics.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • The randomized phase III ELOQUENT-2 study (NCT01239797) evaluated the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% versus Ld (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70). Median time from diagnosis was 3·5 years. We present extended 3-year follow-up data. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and interim overall survival (OS). Exploratory post-hoc analyses included impact of time from diagnosis and prior lines of therapy on PFS, and serum M-protein dynamic modelling. ORR was 79% (ELd) and 66% (Ld) (P = 0·0002). ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 27% versus Ld (HR 0·73; P = 0·0014). Interim OS demonstrated a trend in favour of ELd (P = 0·0257); 1-, 2- and 3-year rates with ELd versus Ld were: 91% versus 83%, 73% versus 69% and 60% versus 53%. In patients with ≥ median time from diagnosis and one prior therapy, ELd resulted in a 53% reduction in the risk of progression/death versus Ld (HR 0·47). Serum M-protein dynamic modelling showed slower tumour regrowth with ELd. Adverse events were comparable between arms. ELd provided a durable and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, with minimal incremental toxicity.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 227 Kifissias Avenue, Athens 14561, Greece. E-mail: mdimop@med.uoa.gr
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items