Robotic axial lower leg testing: repeatability and reproducibility

• Type of Material: Article
• Authors: Thomas Branch, University Orthopedics; Shaun Stinton, ArthroMetrix LLC; Maya Sternberg, Quartiles Consulting; William Hutton, Emory University; Frédéric Lavoie, Hôpital Notre-Dame du CHUM; Christian Guier, San Francisco Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery; Philippe Neyret, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
• Language: English
• Date: 2015-09-10
• Publisher: Springer Verlag (Germany)
• Publication Version: Final Published Version
• Copyright Statement: © The Author(s) 2015
• License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
• Final Published Version (URL): http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3768-4
• Title of Journal or Parent Work: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
• ISSN: 0942-2056
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 10
• Start Page: 2892
• End Page: 2899
• Keywords: Manual examination; Rotational laxity; Robotic testing; Knee laxity; Reliability
• Research Categories: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery; Health Sciences, General

Abstract

© 2015, The Author(s). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the test–retest reliability and the repeatability over multiple days of a robotic testing device when used to measure laxity of the lower leg during a simulated dial test. Methods: Ten healthy subjects were evaluated using an instrumented robotic lower leg testing system over 4 days. Three testing cycles were performed each day. Each leg was rotated into external and then internal rotation by servomotors until a torque threshold of 5.65 N m was reached. Load–deformation curves were generated from torque and rotation data. Both average-measure and single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were compared across the curves. ICC scores were also compared for features of the curves including: maximum external rotation at −5.65 N m of torque, maximum internal rotation at 5.65 N m of torque, rotation at torque 0, compliance (slope of load–deformation curve) at torque 0, endpoint compliance in external rotation, endpoint compliance in internal rotation, and play at torque 0. Play at torque 0 was defined as the width of the hysteresis curve at torque 0. Results: Average-measure ICC scores and test–retest scores were >0.95 along the entire load–deformation curve except around zero torque. ICC scores at maximum internal and external rotation ranged from 0.87 to 0.99 across the left and right knees. ICC scores for the other features of the curves ranged from 0.61 to 0.98. The standard error of the mean ranged from 0.0497 to 1.1712. Conclusions: The robotic testing device in this study proved to be reliable for testing a subject multiple times both within the same day and over multiple days. These findings suggest that the device can provide a level of reliability in rotational testing that allows for clinical use of test results. Objective laxity data can improve consistency and accuracy in diagnosing knee injuries and may enable more effective treatment.