Publication

A packaged intervention to improve viral load monitoring within a deeply rural health district of South Africa

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    J. Brijkumar, University of Kwazulu NatalB.A. Johnson, University of RochesterY. Zhao, Emory UniversityJ. Edwards, Emory UniversityP. Moodley, University of Kwazulu NatalK. Pathan, Emory UniversityS. Pillay, University of Kwazulu NatalKenneth Castro, Emory UniversityH. Sunpath, University of Kwazulu NatalD.R. Kuritzkes, Harvard Medical SchoolM.Y.S. Moosa, University of Kwazulu NatalVincent Marconi, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-11-11
Publisher
  • BMC
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2020
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 20
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 836
End Page
  • 836
Grant/Funding Information
  • The parent study was supported by the Emory University Centre for AIDS Research (CFAR) for salary support (V.C.M., P30AI050409) and NIH/NIAID for salary support and funding the parent study ADReSS (V.C.M. and D.R.K R01 AI098558).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: The KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province of South Africa has the highest prevalence of HIV infection in the world. Viral load (VL) testing is a crucial tool for clinical and programmatic monitoring. Within uMkhanyakude district, VL suppression rates were 91% among patients with VL data; however, VL performance rates averaged only 38·7%. The objective of this study was to determine if enhanced clinic processes and community outreach could improve VL monitoring within this district. Methods: A packaged intervention was implemented at three rural clinics in the setting of the KZN HIV AIDS Drug Resistance Surveillance Study. This included file hygiene, outreach, a VL register and documentation revisions. Chart audits were used to assess fidelity. Outcome measures included percentage VL performed and suppressed. Each rural clinic was matched with a peri-urban clinic for comparison before and after the start of each phase of the intervention. Monthly sample proportions were modelled using quasi-likelihood regression methods for over-dispersed binomial data. Results: Mkuze and Jozini clinics increased VL performance overall from 33·9% and 35·3% to 75·8% and 72·4%, respectively which was significantly greater than the increases in the comparison clinics (RR 1·86 and 1·68, p < 0·01). VL suppression rates similarly increased overall by 39·3% and 36·2% (RR 1·84 and 1·70, p < 0·01). The Chart Intervention phase showed significant increases in fidelity 16 months after implementation. Conclusions: The packaged intervention improved VL performance and suppression rates overall but was significant in Mkuze and Jozini. Larger sustained efforts will be needed to have a similar impact throughout the province.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Biology, Virology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items