Publication

Standalone sauna vs exercise followed by sauna on cardiovascular function in non-naïve sauna users: A comparison of acute effects

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Earric Lee, University of JyväskyläJoel Kostensalo, University of JyväskyläPeter Willeit, Medizinische Universitat InnsbruckSetor K Kunutsor, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustTanjaniina Laukkanen, Itä-Suomen yliopistoFrancesco Zaccardi, Leicester General HospitalHassan Khan, Emory UniversityJari A Laukkanen, University of Jyväskylä
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-12-01
Publisher
  • Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 4
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • e393
End Page
  • e393
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research received no funding.
Abstract
  • Background and aims: Sauna bathing and aerobic exercise have each been shown to affect cardiovascular function. However, direct comparisons between standalone sauna bathing and a combination of exercise and sauna on vascular indices remain limited. Therefore, we conducted a cross-over study using matched durations to explore the hemodynamic changes of sauna exposure when compared to a combination of aerobic exercise and sauna exposure. Methods: Participants (N = 72) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor underwent, on two separate occasions: (a) a 30-minute sauna at 75°C (SAUNA) and (b) the combination of a 15-minute cycling exercise at 75% maximum heart rate followed by 15-minute sauna exposure (EX+SAUNA). Relative changes to arterial stiffness (PWV), augmentation index (Alx), brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), central SBP (cSBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were compared PRE-POST and pre- to 30-minutes post-intervention (PRE-POST30). Results: Baseline SBP and DBP were 143 (SD 18) mmHg and 86 (SD 10) mmHg, respectively. From PRE-POST, SAUNA had lower DBP (mean difference [95% CI] 2.5 [1.0, 4.1], P =.002) and MAP (2.5 [0.6, 4.3], P =.01). However, EX+SAUNA had lower SBP (−2.7 [−4.8, −0.5], P =.02), DBP (−1.8 [−3.3, −0.4], P =.01), and MAP (−2.0 [−3.5, −0.5], P =.009) PRE-POST30. There were no statistically significant differences between SAUNA and EX+SAUNA for other measured parameters. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that when matched for duration, EX+SAUNA and SAUNA elicit comparable acute hemodynamic alterations in middle-aged participants with cardiovascular risk factors. The sauna is a suitable option for acute blood pressure reductions in those who are unable to perform aerobic exercise, and may be a viable lifestyle treatment option to improve blood pressure control.
Author Notes
  • Jari A. Laukkanen, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland. Email: jariantero.laukkanen@uef.fi
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Nutrition

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items