Publication

A peer support program results in greater health benefits for peer leaders than other participants: evidence from the Kerala diabetes prevention program

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Tilahun Haregu, Baker Heart and Diabetes InstituteZahra Aziz, Monash UniversityYingting Cao, Baker Heart and Diabetes InstituteSathish Thirunavukkarasu, Emory UniversityThirunavukkarasu Sathish, Emory UniversityKRavumpurathu Raman Thankappan, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences IndiaJeemon Panniyammakal, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute of Medical Science and TechnologyPilvikki Absetz, Tampere UniversityElezaebeth Mathews, Central University of KeralaSajitha Balachandran, University of KeralaEdwin B Fisher, The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillBrian Oldenburg, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-12-01
Publisher
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2023
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 23
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 1175
End Page
  • 1175
Grant/Funding Information
  • K-DPP was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (Project Grant ID 1005324). The funders were not involved in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the article for publication. The participation of Peers for Progress was supported by the Merck Foundation, Novo Nordisk, the Eli Lilly and Company Foundation, the Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation, and the Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research (NIDDK P30DK092926).
Abstract
  • Background: Peer support programs are promising approaches to diabetes prevention. However, there is still limited evidence on the health benefits of peer support programs for lay peer leaders. Purpose: To examine whether a peer support program designed for diabetes prevention resulted in greater improvements in health behaviors and outcomes for peer leaders as compared to other participants. Methods: 51 lay peer leaders and 437 participants from the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program were included. Data were collected at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. We compared behavioral, clinical, biochemical, and health-related quality of life parameters between peer leaders and their peers at the three time-points. Results: After 12 months, peer leaders showed significant improvements in leisure time physical activity (+ 17.7% vs. + 3.4%, P = 0.001) and health-related quality of life (0.0 vs. + 0.1, P = 0.004); and a significant reduction in alcohol use (-13.6% vs. -6.6%, P = 0.012) and 2-hour plasma glucose (-4.1 vs. + 9.9, P = 0.006), as compared to participants. After 24 months, relative to baseline, peer leaders had significant improvements in fruit and vegetable intake (+ 34.5% vs. + 26.5%, P = 0.017) and leisure time physical activity (+ 7.9% vs. -0.9%, P = 0.009); and a greater reduction in alcohol use (-13.6% vs. -4.9%, P = 0.008), and waist-to-hip ratio (-0.04 vs. -0.02, P = 0.014), as compared to participants. However, only the changes in fruit and vegetable intake and waist-to-hip ratio were maintained between 12 and 24 months. Conclusion: Being a peer leader in a diabetes prevention program was associated with greater health benefits during and after the intervention period. Further studies are needed to examine the long-term sustainability of these benefits.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Psychology, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items