Publication
Assessing the Reliability of the OMERACT Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Scoring System for Temporomandibular Joints (JAMRIS-TMJ)
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/23/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2021-09-01
- Publisher
- MDPI
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2021 by the authors.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 18
- Grant/Funding Information
- Mirkamal Tolend was supported by research scholarship awards from Queen Elizabeth II/Edward Dunlop foundation, Peterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable Foundation, The Hospital for Sick Children ResTraComp, Ontario Graduate Scholarship and Mergelas Family foundation for this study.
- Abstract
- Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most comprehensive modality to assess juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-related inflammation and osteochondral damage in the temporomandibular joints (TMJ). This study tested the reliability of a new JIA MRI scoring system for TMJ (JAMRIS-TMJ) and the impact of variations in calibration and reader specialty. Thirty-one MRI exams of bilateral TMJs were scored independently using the JAMRIS-TMJ by 20 readers consisting of radiologists and non-radiologist clinicians in three reading groups, with or without a calibrating atlas and/or tutorial. The inter-reader reliability in the multidisciplinary cohort assessed by the generalizability coefficient was 0.61–0.67 for the inflammatory and 0.66–0.74 for the damage domain. The atlas and tutorial did not improve agreement within radiologists, but improved the agreement between radiologist and non-radiologist groups. Agreements between different calibration levels were 0.02 to 0.08 lower by the generalizability coefficient compared to agreement within calibration levels; agreement between specialty groups was 0.04 to 0.10 lower than within specialty groups. Averaging two radiologists raised the reliability above 0.8 for both domains. Therefore, the reliability of JAMRIS-TMJ was moderate-to-good depending on the presence of specialty and calibration differences. The atlas and tutorial are necessary to improve reliability when the reader cohort consists of multiple specialties.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Radiology
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w12g3.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-22 | Public | Download |