Publication
Do Sanitation Improvements Reduce Fecal Contamination of Water, Hands, Food, Soil, and Flies? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/21/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2018-11-06
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2018 American Chemical Society.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- ISSN
- 0013-936X
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 21
- Start Page
- 12089
- End Page
- 12097
- Grant/Funding Information
- icddr,b acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and University of California, Berkeley to its research efforts.
- icddr,b is also grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden and the UK for providing core/unrestricted support.
- This research protocol was funded by the World Bank and by Global Development grant OPPGD759 from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to University of California, Berkeley to International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b, grant number 741).
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Sanitation improvements have had limited effectiveness in reducing the spread of fecal pathogens into the environment. We conducted environmental measurements within a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh that implemented individual and combined water treatment, sanitation, handwashing (WSH) and nutrition interventions (WASH Benefits, NCT01590095). Following approximately 4 months of intervention, we enrolled households in the trial's control, sanitation and combined WSH arms to assess whether sanitation improvements, alone and coupled with water treatment and handwashing, reduce fecal contamination in the domestic environment. We quantified fecal indicator bacteria in samples of drinking and ambient waters, child hands, food given to young children, courtyard soil and flies. In the WSH arm, Escherichia coli prevalence in stored drinking water was reduced by 62% (prevalence ratio = 0.38 (0.32, 0.44)) and E. coli concentration by 1-log (Δlog10 = -0.88 (-1.01, -0.75)). The interventions did not reduce E. coli along other sampled pathways. Ambient contamination remained high among intervention households. Potential reasons include noncommunity-level sanitation coverage, child open defecation, animal fecal sources, or naturalized E. coli in the environment. Future studies should explore potential threshold effects of different levels of community sanitation coverage on environmental contamination.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Public Health
- Engineering, Environmental
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - tk3z5.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-03-19 | Public | Download |