A multi-site single-blind clinical study to compare the effects of STAIR Narrative Therapy to treatment as usual among women with PTSD in public sector mental health settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

• Type of Material: Article
• Authors: Marylene Cloitre, VA Palo Alto Health Care System; Clare Henn-Haase, New York University; Judith L Herman, Harvard University; Christie Jackson, New York University; Nadine Kaslow, Emory University; Constance Klein, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research; Michaela Mendelsohn, Harvard University; Eva Petkova, New York University
• Language: English
• Date: 2014
• Publisher: BioMed Central
• Publication Version: Final Published Version
• Copyright Statement: © 2014 Cloitre et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
• License: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• Final Published Version (URL): http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/15/1/197
• Title of Journal or Parent Work: Trials
• ISSN: 1745-6215
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 197
• Grant/Funding Information: This study is funded by NIMH grant 5R01MH086611.
• Keywords: Women’s health; Flexible service delivery; PTSD; Community mental health clinics
• Research Categories: Psychology, General; Health Sciences, Public Health

Abstract

Background This article provides a description of the rationale, design, and methods of a multisite clinical trial which evaluates the potential benefits of an evidence-based psychosocial treatment, STAIR Narrative Therapy, among women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to interpersonal violence who are seeking services in public sector community mental health clinics. This is the first large multisite trial of an evidence-based treatment for PTSD provided in the context of community settings that are dedicated to the treatment of poverty-level patient populations. Methods The study is enrolling 352 participants in a minimum of 4 community clinics. Participants are randomized into either STAIR Narrative Therapy or Treatment As Usual (TAU). Primary outcomes are PTSD, emotion management and interpersonal problems. The study will allow a flexible application of the protocol determined by patient need and preferences. Secondary analyses will assess the relationship of outcomes to different patterns of treatment implementation for different levels of baseline symptom severity. Discussion The article discusses the rationale and study issues related to the use of a flexible delivery of a protocol treatment and of the selection of treatment as it is actually practiced in the community as the comparator.