Publication

Willingness to pay for prevention and treatment of lymphatic filariasis in Leogane, Haiti

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 02/20/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Richard Rheingans, Emory UniversityAnne C Haddix, Emory UniversityMark L Messonnier, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionMartin Meltzer, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionGladys Mayard, Port-au-PrinceDavid G. Addiss, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2004
Publisher
  • BioMed Central
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2004 Rheingans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1475-2883
Volume
  • 3
Issue
  • 2
Grant/Funding Information
  • The study was funded in part by a research grant from the CDC Office of Women's Health.
Abstract
  • Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) affects more than 120 million people worldwide. Efforts to eliminate this disease require sustained community participation. This study explores community valuation of LF elimination efforts by estimating household and community willingness to pay (WTP) for the prevention of transmission and treatment of filarial lymphedema in the community of Leogane, Haiti. Methods: A contingent valuation survey was used to assess individual WTP for specific prevention and treatment interventions. A 2-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation was developed to estimate confidence limits in mean WTP and to generate a distribution of WTP for the community, accounting for uncertainty in regression coefficients and variability within the population. Results: Mean WTP was estimated to be $5.57/month/household (95% CL: $4.76, $6.72) to prevent disease transmission, and $491/yr (95% CL: $377, $662) for treatment of lymphedema for one person. Based on the estimated distributions, 7% and 39% of households were not willing to pay for prevention and treatment, respectively. Conclusions: These results suggest that the majority of the community places a positive value on both prevention and treatment of LF. Mean WTP provides a useful monetary estimate of overall societal benefit of LF prevention and treatment programs. However, for interventions which require broad and sustained community participation, the lower end of the distribution of WTP has additional implications. Cost recovery policies may result in inadequate participation and longer program duration.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management
  • Health Sciences, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items