Publication

Multidisciplinary assessment of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care antigen test in the context of emerging viral variants and self-administration

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Jennifer Frediani, Emory UniversityJoshua Levy, Emory UniversityLeda Bassit, Emory UniversityMiriam Vos, Emory UniversityRobert Jerris, Emory UniversityBeverly Rogers, Emory UniversityMaud Mavigner, Emory UniversityRaymond Schinazi, Emory UniversityJesse Waggoner, Emory UniversityRussell Kempker, Emory UniversityPaulina Rebolledo, Emory UniversityAnn Chahroudi, Emory UniversityClaudia Morris, Emory UniversityJohn Roback, Emory UniversityAnnette Esper, Emory UniversityEric Nehl, Emory UniversityYun Wang, Emory UniversityGregory Martin, Emory UniversityWilbur Lam, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-07-16
Publisher
  • NATURE RESEARCH
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2021
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 11
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 14604
End Page
  • 14604
Grant/Funding Information
  • RADx, Grant/Award Numbers: U54 EB027690 02S1, UL1 TR002378.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • While there has been significant progress in the development of rapid COVID-19 diagnostics, as the pandemic unfolds, new challenges have emerged, including whether these technologies can reliably detect the more infectious variants of concern and be viably deployed in non-clinical settings as “self-tests”. Multidisciplinary evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card (BinaxNOW, a widely used rapid antigen test, included limit of detection, variant detection, test performance across different age-groups, and usability with self/caregiver-administration. While BinaxNOW detected the highly infectious variants, B.1.1.7 (Alpha) first identified in the UK, B.1.351 (Beta) first identified in South Africa, P.1 (Gamma) first identified in Brazil, B.1.617.2 (Delta) first identified in India and B.1.2, a non-VOC, test sensitivity decreased with decreasing viral loads. Moreover, BinaxNOW sensitivity trended lower when devices were performed by patients/caregivers themselves compared to trained clinical staff, despite universally high usability assessments following self/caregiver-administration among different age groups. Overall, these data indicate that while BinaxNOW accurately detects the new viral variants, as rapid COVID-19 tests enter the home, their already lower sensitivities compared to RT-PCR may decrease even more due to user error.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Immunology
  • Biology, Virology
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items