Publication

Cost‐Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl in REDUCE‐IT USA: Results From Patients Randomized in the United States

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/25/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    William S. Weintraub, MedStar Health Research InstituteDeepak L. Bhatt, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health SystemZugui Zhang, Christiana Care Health SystemSarahfaye Dolman, MedStar Health Research InstituteWilliam E. Boden, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare SystemAdam P. Bress, University of UtahBrandon K. Bellows, Columbia UniversityCatherine G. Derington, University of UtahSephy Philip, Amarin Pharma, IncGabriel Steg, Medical School of Université de Paris‐CitéMichael Miller, University of PennsylvaniaEliot A. Brinton, Utah Lipid CenterTerry A Jacobson, Emory UniversityJean-Claude Tardif, Université de MontréalChristie M. Ballantyne, Baylor College of MedicinePaul Kolm, MedStar Health Research Institute
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2023-12-29
Publisher
  • American Heart Association
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 13
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • e032413
Grant/Funding Information
  • This analysis was supported by an unrestricted grant from Amarin Pharma, Inc, the manufacturer of the drug. The analysis was performed independently by the academic investigators, who had full access to patient‐level data from REDUCE‐IT USA (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl Intervention Trial USA) and take full responsibility for the conduct and integrity of the analysis. One current employee of Amarin (Dr Philip) is a coauthor of this article.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background In 3146 REDUCE‐IT USA (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl Intervention Trial USA) participants, icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced first and total cardiovascular events by 31% and 36%, respectively, over 4.9 years of follow‐up. Methods and Results We used participant‐level data from REDUCE‐IT USA, 2021 US costs, and IPE costs ranging from $4.59 to $11.48 per day, allowing us to examine a range of possible medication costs. The in‐trial analysis was participant‐level, whereas the lifetime analysis used a Markov model. Both analyses considered value from a US health sector perspective. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (incremental costs divided by incremental quality‐adjusted life‐years) of IPE compared with standard care (SC) was the primary outcome measure. There was incremental gain in quality‐adjusted life‐years with IPE compared with SC using in‐trial (3.28 versus 3.13) and lifetime (10.36 versus 9.83) horizons. Using an IPE cost of $4.59 per day, health care costs were lower with IPE compared with SC for both in‐trial ($29 420 versus $30 947) and lifetime ($216 243 versus $219 212) analyses. IPE versus SC was a dominant strategy in trial and over the lifetime, with 99.7% lifetime probability of an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio <$50 000 per quality‐adjusted life‐year gained. At a medication cost of $11.48 per day, the cost per quality‐adjusted life‐year gained was $36 208 in trial and $9582 over the lifetime. Conclusions In this analysis, at $4.59 per day, IPE offers better outcomes than SC at lower costs in trial and over a lifetime and is cost‐effective at $11.48 per day for conventional willingness‐to‐pay thresholds. Treatment with IPE should be strongly considered in US patients like those enrolled in REDUCE‐IT USA.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items