Publication

Electrical Stimulation Modulates High γ Activity and Human Memory Performance

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Michal T. Berry, Mayo ClinicBrent M. Kremen, Mayo ClinicVaclav Miller, Mayo ClinicLaura Miller Khadjevand, Mayo ClinicFatemeh Ezzyat, University of PennsylvaniaYoussef Stein, University of PennsylvaniaJoel Wanda, University of PennsylvaniaPaul Sperling, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalMichael R. Gorniak, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalRichard Davis, University of PennsylvaniaKathryn Jobst, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterBarbara Gross, Emory UniversityMichal T. Kucewicz, Mayo ClinicBradley Lega, UT Southwestern Medical CenterS. Matt Stead, Mayo ClinicDaniel S. Rizzuto, University of PennsylvaniaMichael J. Kahana, University of PennsylvaniaGregory A. Worrell, Mayo Clinic
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-01-01
Publisher
  • Emory University Libraries
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 Kucewicz et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 5
Issue
  • 1
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by the DARPA Restoring Active Memory (RAM) Program (Cooperative Agreement N66001-14-2-4032). V.K. was additionally supported by the Czech Technical University in Prague.
Abstract
  • Direct electrical stimulation of the brain has emerged as a powerful treatment for multiple neurological diseases, and as a potential technique to enhance human cognition. Despite its application in a range of brain disorders, it remains unclear how stimulation of discrete brain areas affects memory performance and the underlying electrophysiological activities. Here, we investigated the effect of direct electrical stimulation in four brain regions known to support declarative memory: hippocampus (HP), parahippocampal region (PH) neocortex, prefrontal cortex (PF), and lateral temporal cortex (TC). Intracranial EEG recordings with stimulation were collected from 22 patients during performance of verbal memory tasks. We found that high γ (62-118 Hz) activity induced by word presentation was modulated by electrical stimulation. This modulatory effect was greatest for trials with “poor” memory encoding. The high γ modulation correlated with the behavioral effect of stimulation in a given brain region: it was negative, i.e., the induced high γ activity was decreased, in the regions where stimulation decreased memory performance, and positive in the lateral TC where memory enhancement was observed. Our results suggest that the effect of electrical stimulation on high γ activity induced by word presentation may be a useful biomarker for mapping memory networks and guiding therapeutic brain stimulation.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence should be addressed to either of the following: Michal T. Kucewicz, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, E-mail: kucewicz.michal@mayo.eduk; or Gregory A. Worrell, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, E-mail: worrell.gregory@mayo.edu.
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Engineering, Biomedical
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items