Publication

Mental health status and quality of life in close contacts of COVID-19 patients in the post-COVID-19 era: a comparative study

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Yan-Jie Zhao, University of MacauShu-Fang Zhang, China University of GeosciencesWen Li, University of MacauLing Zhang, Capital Medical UniversityTeris Cheung, Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityYilang Tang, Emory UniversityChee H. Ng, University of MelbourneBing-Xiang Yang, Wuhan UniversityYu-Tao Xiang, University of Macau
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-10-02
Publisher
  • SPRINGERNATURE
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2021
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 11
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 505
End Page
  • 505
Grant/Funding Information
  • The study was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for investigational new drug (2018ZX09201-014), the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (No. Z181100001518005), the University of Macau (MYRG2019-00066-FHS), Faculty-allocated funds for PIs (FAF), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020YJ065).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Close contacts of those with COVID-19 (CC) may experience distress and long-lasting mental health effects. However, the mental health status and quality of life (QOL) in CC have not been adequately examined. This study examined the mental health status and QOL in CC during the post-COVID-19 period. This cross-sectional study comprised 1169 CC and 1290 who were non-close contacts (non-CC). Demographic data were collected; depression, fatigue, post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and QOL were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9), fatigue numeric rating scale, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - 17 items (PCL-17), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire - brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), respectively. Analysis of covariance was used to compare depressive symptoms, QOL, fatigue, and PTSS between the CC and non-CC groups. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent correlates for depression, fatigue, PTSS, and QOL in the CC group. Compared to the non-CC group, the CC group reported significantly more severe depression (F(1, 2458) = 5.58, p = 0.018) and fatigue (F(1, 2458) = 9.22, p = 0.002) in the post-COVID-19 period. No significant differences in PTSS and QOL between the CC and non-CC groups were found (F(1, 2458) = 2.93, p = 0.087 for PTSS; F(1, 2458) = 3.45, p = 0.064 for QOL). In the CC group, younger age, financial loss due to COVID-19, and perception of poor or fair health status were significantly associated with depression and fatigue, while frequent use of mass media was significantly associated with fatigue. In conclusion, close contacts of COVID-19 patients experienced high levels of depression and fatigue in the post-COVID-19 period. Due to the negative effects of depression and fatigue on daily functioning, early detection and timely interventions should be provided to this neglected population.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Psychology, Clinical
  • Psychology, Behavioral
  • Biology, Neuroscience

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items