Publication

Chest Pain and Mental Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia: Sex Differences

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Pratik Pimple, Emory UniversityMuhammad Hammadah, Emory UniversityKobina Wilmot, Emory UniversityRonnie Ramadan, Emory UniversityIbhar Al Mheid, Emory UniversityOleksiy Levantsevych, Emory UniversitySamaah Sullivan, Emory UniversityErnest V Garcia, Emory UniversityJonathon Nye, Emory UniversityAmit J. Shah, Emory UniversityLaura Ward, Emory UniversityPuja Mehta, Emory UniversityPaolo Raggi, Emory UniversityJ. Douglas Bremner, Emory UniversityArshed Ali Quyyumi, Emory UniversityViola Vaccarino, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-05-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier: 12 months
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0002-9343
Volume
  • 131
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 540
End Page
  • +
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01 HL101398, R01HL109413, R01HL109413-02S1, K24HL077506, K24 MH076955, UL1TR000454, KL2TR000455, and THL130025A).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: Mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia is a frequent phenomenon in patients with coronary artery disease. Women with coronary artery disease tend to have more mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia and more chest pain/anginal symptoms than men, but whether the association between mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia and angina burden differs in women and men is unknown. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with experimental manipulation of 950 individuals with stable coronary artery disease. Chest pain/angina frequency in the previous 4 weeks was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire's angina-frequency subscale. Mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia was assessed with myocardial perfusion imaging during mental stress (standardized public speaking task). Presence of mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia was based on expert readers and established criteria. A conventional (exercise or pharmacologic) stress test was used as a control condition. Results: Overall, 338 individuals (37%) reported angina; 112 (12%) developed mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia, and 256 (29%) developed conventional stress ischemia. Women who reported angina had almost double the probability to develop mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia (19% vs 10%, adjusted prevalence rate ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.46), whereas there was no such difference in men (11% vs 11%, adjusted prevalence rate ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.82). No association was found between angina symptoms and conventional stress ischemia for women or men. Results for ischemia as a continuous variable were similar. Conclusions: In women, but not in men, anginal symptoms may be a marker of vulnerability toward ischemia induced by psychologic stress. These results highlight the psychosocial origins of angina in women and may have important implications for the management and prognosis of women with angina.
Author Notes
  • Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD, Emory University, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Room 3011, Atlanta, GA 30322, Phone: 404-727-8710; Fax: 404-727-8737; viola.vaccarino@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences, Mental Health

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items