Publication

Evaluation of medication errors with implementation of electronic health record technology in the medical intensive care unit

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 06/17/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    T. Vivian Liao, Mercer Health Sciences CenterMarina Rabinovich, Emory UniversityPrasad Abraham, Emory UniversitySebastian Perez, Emory UniversityChristina DiPlotti, Pharmacy, Ingles MarketsGreg Martin, Emory UniversityEric G Honig, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-05-23
Publisher
  • Dovepress
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 2017
Issue
  • 9
Start Page
  • 31
End Page
  • 40
Abstract
  • Purpose: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk for medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug events from multifactorial causes. ME rate ranges from 1.2 to 947 per 1,000 patient days in the medical ICU (MICU). Studies with the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) have concluded that it significantly reduced overall prescribing errors and the number of errors that caused patient harm decreased. However, other types of errors, such as wrong dose and omission of required medications increased after EHR implementation. We sought to compare the number of MEs before and after EHR implementation in the MICU, with additional evaluation of error severity. Patients and methods: Prospective, observational, quality improvement study of all patients admitted to a single MICU service at an academic medical center. Patients were evaluated during four periods over 2 years: August–September 2010 (preimplementation; period I), January–February 2011 (2 months postimplementation; period II), August–September 2012 (21 months postimplementation; period III), and January–February 2013 (25 months postimplementation; period IV). All medication orders and administration records were reviewed by an ICU clinical pharmacist and ME was defined as a deviation from established standards for prescribing, dispensing, administering, or documenting medication. The frequency and classification of MEs were compared between groups by chi square; p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of MEs per 1,000 patient days during time periods II (N=2,592; p<0.001) and III (N=2,388; p=0.0023) compared to baseline (N=1,972). However, over time there was a significant reduction in medication errors during period IV compared to baseline (N=1,669; p=0.0008). Conclusion: In the short-term, EHR did not lead to a reduction in medication errors in the ICU; however, there was a significant decrease in medication errors after 2 years.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Marina Rabinovich Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Nutrition, Grady Health System, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; Tel +1 404 616 1628; Email mrabinovich@gmh.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Health Care Management
  • Health Sciences, Pharmacy

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items