Publication

Evidence-based practice 'on-the-go': using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative.

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Nicola J. Hancock, University of East AngliaKathryn Collins, Bournemouth UniversityCharlie Dorer, Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation TrustSteven Wolf, Emory UniversityMark Bayley, University of TorontoValerie M. Pomeroy, University of East Anglia
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019
Publisher
  • BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2399-6641
Volume
  • 8
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • e000592
End Page
  • e000592
Grant/Funding Information
  • This project was funded by the University of East Anglia Impact Funding (HEIF).
  • Initial support for the development of the ViaTherapy app came from the Canadian Stroke Network.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Recovery of upper limb function after stroke is currently sub-optimal, despite good quality evidence showing that interventions enabling repetitive practice of task-specific activity are effective in improving function. Therapists need to access and engage with such evidence to optimise outcomes with people with stroke, but this is challenging in fast-paced stroke rehabilitation services. This quality improvement project aimed to investigate acceptability and service impact of a new, international tool for accessing evidence on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke-'ViaTherapy'-in a team of community rehabilitation therapists. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken at baseline to determine confidence in, and barriers to, evidence-based practice (EBP) to support clinical decision making. Reported barriers included time, lack of access to evidence and a research-practice disconnect. The clinicians then integrated use of 'ViaTherapy' into their practice for 4 weeks. Follow-up interviews explored the accessibility of the tool in community rehabilitation practice, and its impact on clinician confidence, treatment planning and provision. Clinicians found the tool, used predominantly in mobile device app format, to be concise and simple to use, providing evidence 'on-the-go'. Confidence in accessing and using EBP grew by 22% from baseline. Clinicans reported changes in intensity of delivery of interventions, as rapid access to recommended doses via the tool was available. Following this work, the participating health and social care service provider changed provision of therapists' technology to enable use of apps. Barriers to use of EBP in stroke rehabilitation persist; the baseline situation here supported the need for more accessible means of integrating best evidence into clinical processes. This quality improvement project successfully integrated ViaTherapy into clinical practice, and found that the tool has potential to underpin positive changes in upper limb therapy service delivery after stroke, by increasing accessibility to, use of and confidence in EBP. Definitive evaluation is now indicated.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence to Dr. Nicola J Hancock, University of East Anglia School of Health Sciences, Norwich, UK; n.hancock@uea.ac.uk
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items