Publication

A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Elizabeth Anne Krupinski, Emory UniversityMerce Comas, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research InstituteLeia Garrote Gallego, Roche Diagnostics Information Solutions
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-01-01
Publisher
  • Medknow Publications
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 Journal of Pathology Informatics
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2229-5089
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 26
End Page
  • 26
Grant/Funding Information
  • This work was supported by Roche Diagnostics; Leia Garrote Gallego, MD was an employee of Roche at the time of the study.
Abstract
  • Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.
Author Notes
  • Address for correspondence: Dr. Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. E-mail: ekrupin@emory.edu
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Radiology
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items