Publication

Selective constraint and adaptive potential of West Nile virus within and among naturally infected avian hosts and mosquito vectors.

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Chase W. Nelson, American Museum of Natural HistorySamuel D. Sibley, University of Wisconsin-MadisonSergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, American Museum of Natural HistoryGabriel L. Hamer, Texas A&M UniversityChristina M. Newman, University of Wisconsin-MadisonTavis K. Anderson, University of Wisconsin-MadisonEdward D. Walker, Michigan State UniversityUriel Kitron, Emory UniversityJeffrey D. Brawn, University of IllinoisMarilyn O. Ruiz, University of IllinoisTony L. Goldberg, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2018-01
Publisher
  • Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy C - Option B
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 2057-1577
Volume
  • 4
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • vey013
End Page
  • vey013
Grant/Funding Information
  • This research was funded by the National Science Foundation Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Disease program under awards 0429124 and 0840403 to E.D.W., U.D.K., J.D.B., M.O.R., and T.L.G., and by a Gerstner Scholars Fellowship from the Gerstner Family Foundation at the American Museum of Natural History to C.W.N.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Arthropod-borne viruses are among the most genetically constrained RNA viruses, yet they have a remarkable propensity to adapt and emerge. We studied wild birds and mosquitoes naturally infected with West Nile virus (WNV) in a 'hot spot' of virus transmission in Chicago, IL, USA. We generated full coding WNV genome sequences from spatiotemporally matched bird and mosquito samples using high-throughput sequencing, allowing a molecular evolutionary assessment with deep coverage. Mean FST among samples was 0.66 (±0.02 SE) and was bimodal, with mean nucleotide diversity being higher between samples (interhost πN = 0.001; πS = 0.024) than within them (intrahost πN < 0.0001; πS < 0.001). Eight genomic sites with FST > 1.01 (in the PrM, NS2a, NS3, NS4b, and 5'-noncoding genomic regions) showed bird versus mosquito variant frequency differences of >30 per cent and/or polymorphisms fixed in ≥5 host or vector individuals, suggesting host tropism for these variants. However, phylogenetic analyses demonstrated a lack of grouping by bird or mosquito, most inter-sample differences were synonymous (mean interhost πN/πS = 0.04), and there was no significant difference between hosts and vectors in either their nucleotide diversities or levels of purifying selection (mean intrahost πN/πS = 0.28 in birds and πN/πS = 0.21 in mosquitoes). This finding contrasts with the 'trade-off' and 'selective sieve' hypotheses that have been proposed and tested in the laboratory, which predict strong host versus vector effects on WNV genetic variation, with heightened selective constraint in birds alternating with heightened viral diversity in mosquitoes. Overall, our data show WNV to be highly selectively constrained within and between both hosts and vectors but still able to vary at a limited number of sites across the genome. Such site-specific plasticity in the face of overall selective constraint may offer a mechanism whereby highly constrained viruses such as WNV and its relatives can still adapt and emerge.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Microbiology
  • Health Sciences, Epidemiology
  • Biology, Molecular

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items