Publication
Parental Attitudes and Hesitancy About COVID-19 vs. Routine Childhood Vaccinations: A National Survey
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/20/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2021-10-13
- Publisher
- Emory University Libraries
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2021 Temsah, Alhuzaimi, Aljamaan, Bahkali, Al-Eyadhy, Alrabiaah, Alhaboob, Bashiri, Alshaer, Temsah, Bassrawi, Alshahrani, Chaiah, Alaraj, Assiri, Jamal, Batais, Saddik, Halwani, Alzamil, Memish, Barry, Al-Subaie, Al-Tawfiq and Alhasan.
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 9
- Start Page
- 752323
- End Page
- 752323
- Grant/Funding Information
- This study was supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge.
- Abstract
- Objectives: To quantify parental acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine and assess the vaccine hesitancy (VH) for COVID-19 vs. childhood vaccines. Methods: Eight vaccine hesitancy scale (VHS) items, adopted from WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Immunization (SAGE), were used to assess VH for COVID-19 vaccine vs. routine childhood vaccines. We distributed the online survey to parents with the commence of the national childhood COVID-19 vaccination program in Saudi Arabia. Results: Among 3,167 parents, 47.6% are decided to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. The most common reasons for refusal were inadequate safety information (69%) and worry about side effects (60.6%). Parents have a significantly greater positive attitudes toward children's routine vaccines vs. the COVID-19 vaccine, with higher mean VHS (±SD) = 2.98 ± 0.58 vs. 2.63 ± 0.73, respectively (p-value < 0.001). Parents agreed more that routine childhood vaccines are more essential and effective as compared to the COVID-19 vaccine (Cohen's D: 0.946, and 0.826, consecutively; T-test p-value < 0.00). There is more parental anxiety about serious side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine vs. routine childhood vaccines (Cohen's D = 0.706, p-value < 0.001). Parents who relied on the Ministry of Health information were more predicted (OR = 1.28, p-value = 0.035) to intend to vaccinate as opposed to those who used the WHO website (OR = 0.47, −53%, p-value < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factors associated with intention to vaccinate children were parents who received COVID-19 vaccine, older parents, having children aged 12–18, and parents with lower education levels. Conclusions: Significant proportion of parents are hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine because they are less confident in its effectiveness, safety, and whether it is essential for their children. Relying on the national official healthcare authority's website for the source of information was associated with increased acceptance of childhood COVID-19 vaccination. As parental intention to vaccinate children against COVID-19 is suboptimal, healthcare authorities could boost vaccine uptake by campaigns targeting hesitant parents.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Public Health
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w1nb9.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-19 | Public | Download |