Publication

Transfusion-Induced Bone Marrow Transplant Rejection Due to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    James Zimring, Emory UniversitySeema R. Patel, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-10-01
Publisher
  • W B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc.
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 27
Issue
  • 4
Start Page
  • 241
End Page
  • 248
Grant/Funding Information
  • No funding information to disclose.
Abstract
  • Traditionally, alloimmunization to transfused blood products has focused exclusively on recipient antibodies recognizing donor alloantigens present on the cell surface. Accordingly, the immunologic sequelae of alloimmunization have been antibody mediated effects (ie, hemolytic transfusion reactions, platelet refractoriness, anti-HLA and anti-HNA effects, etc). However, in addition to the above sequelae, there is also a correlation between the number of antecedent transfusions in humans and the rate of bone marrow transplant (BMT) rejection-under reduced intensity conditioning with HLA-matched or HLA-identical marrow. Bone marrow transplant of this nature is the only existing cure for a series of nonmalignant hematologic diseases (eg, sickle cell disease, thalassemias, etc); however, rejection remains a clinical problem. It has been hypothesized that transfusion induces subsequent BMT rejection through immunization. Studies in animal models have observed the same effect and have demonstrated that transfusion-induced BMT rejection can occur in response to alloimmunization. However, unlike traditional antibody responses, sensitization in this case results in cellular immune effects, involving populations such as T cell or natural killer cells. In this case, rejection occurs in the absence of alloantibodies and would not be detected by existing immune-hematologic methods. We review human and animal studies in light of the hypothesis that, for distinct clinical populations, enhanced rejection of BMT may be an unappreciated adverse consequence of transfusion, which current blood bank methodologies are unable to detect.
Author Notes
  • James Zimring, MD, PhD, Puget Sound Blood Center Research Institute, 1551 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102, USA, jzimring@psbc.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items