Publication

Molecular Testing for Selection of Patients With Lung Cancer for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology Guideline

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreNatasha Rekhtman, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New YorkWilliam A. Biermann, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery, East Norriton, PAJames Huang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New YorkMari Mino-Kenudson, Massachusetts General HospitalSuresh Ramalingam, Emory UniversityHoward West, Swedish Cancer InstituteSara Whitlock, Free to Breathe, Madison, WIMark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-11-10
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 32
Issue
  • 32
Start Page
  • 3673
End Page
  • 3681
Grant/Funding Information
  • None declared
Abstract
  • Purpose: The College of American Pathologists (CAP), the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guideline on molecular testing for the selection of patients with lung cancer for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors was considered for endorsement. Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) staff reviewed the CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline for developmental rigor; an ASCO ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the guideline content. Results: The ASCO panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area and present options that will be acceptable to patients. The CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline comprises 37 recommendations (evidence grade A or B), expert consensus opinions, or suggestions that address the following five principal questions: (1) When should molecular testing be performed? (2) How should EGFR testing be performed? (3) How should ALK testing be performed? (4) Should other genes be routinely tested in lung adenocarcinoma? (5) How should molecular testing be implemented and operationalized? Conclusion: The ASCO review panel endorses the CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline. This guideline represents an important advance toward standardization of EGFR and ALK testing practices and is of major clinical relevance in advancing the care of patients with lung cancer. In the Discussion section, the ASCO review panel highlights three evolving areas: advances in ALK testing methodology, considerations for selecting appropriate populations for molecular testing, and emergence of other targetable molecular alterations.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2318 Mill Rd, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314; e-mail: guidelines@asco.org
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Molecular
  • Health Sciences, Pathology
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items