Publication

Do inequalities exist in housing and working conditions among local and migrant industrial workers in Vietnam? Results from a multi-site survey

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 09/18/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ngoc Do Ha, Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth UnionMilkie Vu, Emory UniversityAnh Tuan Nguyen, Youth Research Institute, VietnamQuynh Thi Nguyen Hoa, Youth Research Institute, VietnamPhuong Bui Thanh, Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth UnionVan Nguyen Quy, Youth Research Institute, VietnamThu Thi Tran Ngan, Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth UnionBac Thi La Ly, Hanoi National University of Education, VietnamThu Thi Nguyen Nga, Hanoi Metropolitan UniversityQuang N Nguyen, Hanoi Medical UniversityThanh Phan Hai, Duy Tan UniversityThi Hoang Men, Duy Tan UniversityGia Vu Linh, Duy Tan UniversityMinh Thi Vu Thuc, Institute of Health Economics and TechnologyXuan Tran Bach, Hanoi Medical UniversityCarl A Latkin, Johns Hopkins UniversityCyrus SH Ho, National University Hospital, SingaporeRoger CM Ho, National University of Singapore
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2021-07-17
Publisher
  • ELSEVIER
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 143
Grant/Funding Information
  • Milkie Vu is supported by the National Cancer Institute (F31CA243220–01). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Background: While internal migrants in Vietnam have been a key driving force in the country's rapid economic development, they also face many vulnerabilities. Our study seeks to explore possible inequalities in housing and working conditions between local and internal migrant industrial workers in Vietnam. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted with 1200 industrial workers in four regions of Vietnam. Dependent variables included housing conditions (satisfaction with convenience of accommodation, sanitation and water of accommodation, and accommodation in general) and working conditions (satisfaction with income, monthly income, number of hazardous working conditions, and work-related stress measured through the modified Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire). The primary independent variable is migrant status. Covariates included region, gender, education, marital status, accommodation status, living arrangements, industry, age, monthly income, experience, and working hours. Results: Of the sample, 24.7% (n = 296) were migrants. Overall, no differences were found regarding housing conditions by migrant status. In adjusted regression models, migrants reported higher numbers of hazardous working conditions (β = 0.07, 95 %CI = 0.01–0.13, p = 0.01) and higher monthly income (β = 0.05, 95 %CI = 0.01–0.09, p = 0.02). Discussion: Recent state-level changes in the Vietnamese household registration system may explain the lack of differences in housing conditions by migrant status. Future research should utilize longitudinal designs to examine impacts over time of state policy on migrants’ housing conditions as well as well-being. Regarding working conditions, findings highlight the need for stronger social protection policy and better information channels on occupational health and safety for migrants. Further research, including qualitative studies, is needed to explore why migrants face more hazardous working conditions.
Author Notes
  • Hai Thanh Phan, BSc, Institute for Global Health Innovations, Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam, Tel: (+84) 333998764. Email: phanthanhhai9@duytan.edu.vn
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items