Automated cognitive testing of monkeys in social groups yields results comparable to individual laboratory based testing

• Type of Material: Article
• Authors: Regina Paxton Gazes, Emory University; Emily Kathryn Brown, Emory University; Benjamin M. Basile, Emory University; Robert R. Hampton, Emory University
• Language: English
• Date: 2012-12-21
• Publisher: Springer Nature
• Publication Version: Author Accepted Manuscript (After Peer Review)
• Copyright Statement: © 2012, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
• License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
• Final Published Version (URL): https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0585-8
• Title of Journal or Parent Work: Animal Cognition
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 3
• Start Page: 445
• End Page: 458
• Grant/Funding Agency: Office of Research Infrastructure Programs; Center for Behavioral Neuroscience; NSF; National Center for Research; James S. McDonnell Foundation; NIH
• Grant/Funding Information: The Yerkes National Primate Research Center is fully accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. This project was funded by the National Center for Research Resources P51RR165, currently supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD P51OD11132, the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience under the STC Program of the NSF under Agreement IBN-9876754, a grant from the James S. McDonnell Foundation, NIH grant 1R01MH082819, NSF grants 0745573 and 1146316. Regina Paxton was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant DGE- 0231900.
• Keywords: social housing; RFID; classification; memory; transitive inference; rhesus macaque; psychophysics
• Subject - Topics: Primates--Behavior; Cognition in animals; Psychological tests

Abstract

Cognitive abilities likely evolved in response to specific environmental and social challenges and are therefore expected to be specialized for the life history of each species. Specialized cognitive abilities may be most readily engaged under conditions that approximate the natural environment of the species being studied. While naturalistic environments might therefore have advantages over laboratory settings for cognitive research, it is difficult to conduct certain types of cognitive tests in these settings. We implemented methods for automated cognitive testing of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in large social groups (Field station) and compared the performance to that of laboratory housed monkeys (Laboratory). The Field station animals shared access to four touch screen computers in a large naturalistic social group. Each Field station subject had an RFID chip implanted in each arm for computerized identification and individualized assignment of cognitive tests. The Laboratory group was housed and tested in a typical laboratory setting, with individual access to testing computers in their home cages. Monkeys in both groups voluntarily participated at their own pace for food rewards. We evaluated performance in two visual psychophysics tests, a perceptual classification test, a transitive inference test, and a delayed matching to sample memory test. Despite differences in housing, social environment, age, and sex, monkeys in the two groups performed similarly in all tests. Semi-free ranging monkeys living in complex social environments are therefore viable subjects for cognitive testing designed to take advantage of the unique affordances of naturalistic testing environments.