Publication

Absolute Risk Prediction of Second Primary Thyroid Cancer Among 5-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/14/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Stephanie A. Kovalchik, National Institutes of HealthCecile M. Ronckers, Late Effects After Childhood Cancer TreatmentLene H. S. Veiga, Brazilian Nuclear Energy CommissionAlice J. Sigurdson, National Institutes of HealthPeter D. Inskip, National Institutes of HealthFlorent de Vathaire, National Institute of Health and Medical ResearchCharles A. Sklar, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterSarah S. Donaldson, Stanford UniversityHarald Anderson, Lund UniversityParveen Bhatti, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSue Hammond, Nationwide Children’s HospitalWendy M. Leisenring, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterAnn Mertens, Emory UniversitySusan Smith, Emory UniversityMarilyn Stovall, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterMargaret A. Tucker, National Institutes of HealthRita E. Weathers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterLeslie L. Robison, St Jude Children's Research HospitalRuth M. Pfeiffer, National Cancer Institute
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2013-01-01
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0732-183X
Volume
  • 31
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 119
End Page
  • 127
Grant/Funding Information
  • The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study was supported by Grant No. U24 CA55727 from the NCI (L.L.R.).
  • Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Purpose: We developed three absolute risk models for second primary thyroid cancer to assist with long-term clinical monitoring of childhood cancer survivors. Patients and Methods: We used data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and two nested case-control studies (Nordic CCSS; Late Effects Study Group). Model M1 included self-reported risk factors, model M2 added basic radiation and chemotherapy treatment information abstracted from medical records, and model M3 refined M2 by incorporating reconstructed radiation absorbed dose to the thyroid. All models were validated in an independent cohort of French childhood cancer survivors. Results: M1 included birth year, initial cancer type, age at diagnosis, sex, and past thyroid nodule diagnosis. M2 added radiation (yes/no), radiation to the neck (yes/no), and alkylating agent (yes/no). Past thyroid nodule was consistently the strongest risk factor (M1 relative risk [RR], 10.8; M2 RR, 6.8; M3 RR, 8.2). In the validation cohort, 20-year absolute risk predictions for second primary thyroid cancer ranged from 0.04% to 7.4% for M2. Expected events agreed well with observed events for each model, indicating good calibration. All models had good discriminatory ability (M1 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; M2 AUC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.86; M3 AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.82). Conclusion: We developed and validated three absolute risk models for second primary thyroid cancer. Model M2, with basic prior treatment information, could be useful for monitoring thyroid cancer risk in childhood cancer survivors.
Author Notes
  • Ruth M. Pfeiffer, PhD, Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS 8030, Rockville, MD 20852; e-mail: pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Oncology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items