Publication

The NOCTURNE Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Tolvaptan Formulations

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/23/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Ronald D. Perrone, Tufts UniversityArlene Chapman, Emory UniversityDorothee Oberdhan, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & CommercializationFrank S. Czerwiec, Goldfinch Bio Inc.Olga Sergeyeva, Global Clinical Development, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & CommercializationJohn Ouyang, Global Clinical Development, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & CommercializationSusan E. Shoaf, Global Clinical Development, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2020-06-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier Science Inc.
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 5
Issue
  • 6
Start Page
  • 801
End Page
  • 812
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization (Rockville, MD). Andrew J. Horgan, PhD, of BioScience Communications, Inc. (New York, NY) assisted in drafting the manuscript, activity that was also funded by Otsuka.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • ntroduction Tolvaptan, a treatment for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), inhibits vasopressin V2 receptor signaling, which causes aquaretic adverse events (AAEs). The short-term efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily, modified-release (MR) formulation was assessed relative to the twice-daily, immediate-release (IR) formulation. Methods This Phase 2 multicenter, randomized (1:1:1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blind, placebo-masked, parallel-group study (NCT01451827) compared tolvaptan MR 50 mg once daily or tolvaptan MR 80 mg once daily with tolvaptan IR 60/30 mg daily split dose and placebo over 8 weeks in 177 subjects. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in total kidney volume (TKV) at week 3. Other endpoints included tolerability, assessed by adverse events and quality of life (QOL) measures. Results Mean percentage decreases in TKV at week 3 were observed for the pooled group of all (MR+IR) tolvaptan-treated subjects (−2.07%), tolvaptan MR 80 mg (−2.55%), and tolvaptan MR 50 mg (−2.46%) versus placebo (0.09%; P < 0.02 for each comparison with placebo), whereas the decrease with tolvaptan IR 60/30 mg (−1.17%; P = 0.24) did not reach significance. All tolvaptan regimens were associated with AAEs, but scores on ADPKD-specific and generic patient-reported outcome assessments showed little impact based on dosage on overall health-related QOL versus placebo. Conclusion Tolvaptan MR and tolvaptan IR demonstrated similar short-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety, with low impact on multiple measures of QOL. Conclusions regarding long-term efficacy are limited by the short duration of follow-up.
Author Notes
  • Correspondence: Dorothee Oberdhan, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., 2440 Research Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. dorothee.oberdhan@otsuka-us.com
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items