Publication

Endogenous cortisol correlates with performance under pressure on a working memory task in capuchin monkeys

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/21/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Meghan J Sosnowski, Georgia State UniversityMarcela E Benítez, Emory UniversitySarah F Brosnan, Georgia State University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2022-12-01
Publisher
  • Springer Nature
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © The Author(s) 2022
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 12
Issue
  • 1
Start Page
  • 953
End Page
  • 953
Grant/Funding Information
  • This material is based upon work supported by Georgia State University - Brains & Behavior Doctoral Fellowship, NSF
  • Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
  • Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES) under the Grant Nos. 1919305, 1658867 and Georgia State University - Brains & Behavior Seed Grant.
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Humans often experience striking performance deficits when their outcomes are determined by their own performance, colloquially referred to as “choking under pressure.” Physiological stress responses that have been linked to both choking and thriving are well-conserved in primates, but it is unknown whether other primates experience similar effects of pressure. Understanding whether this occurs and, if so, its physiological correlates, will help clarify the evolution and proximate causes of choking in humans. To address this, we trained capuchin monkeys on a computer game that had clearly denoted high- and low-pressure trials, then tested them on trials with the same signals of high pressure, but no difference in task difficulty. Monkeys significantly varied in whether they performed worse or better on high-pressure testing trials and performance improved as monkeys gained experience with performing under pressure. Baseline levels of cortisol were significantly negatively related to performance on high-pressure trials as compared to low-pressure trials. Taken together, this indicates that less experience with pressure may interact with long-term stress to produce choking behavior in early sessions of a task. Our results suggest that performance deficits (or improvements) under pressure are not solely due to human specific factors but are rooted in evolutionarily conserved biological factors.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Anthropology, Medical and Forensic
  • Psychology, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items