Measuring conceptual health knowledge in the context of oral health literacy: preliminary results

• Type of Material: Article
• Authors: Mark D. Macek, University of Maryland; Don Haynes, University of Baltimore; William Wells, University of Baltimore; Simon Bauer-Leffler, University of Baltimore; P. Ann Cotten, University of Baltimore; Ruth Parker, Emory University
• Language: English
• Date: 2010-06-01
• Publisher: Wiley: 12 months
• Publication Version: Author Accepted Manuscript (After Peer Review)
• Copyright Statement: © 2010 American Association of Public Health Dentistry.
• Final Published Version (URL): http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00165.x
• Title of Journal or Parent Work: Journal of Public Health Dentistry
• ISSN: 0022-4006
• Volume: 70
• Issue: 3
• Start Page: 197
• End Page: 204
• Keywords: DENTISTRY; dental caries; health knowledge; periodontal diseases; adult; Science & Technology; practice; attitudes; INSTRUMENT; oral health; questionnaires; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; mouth neoplasms; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
• Research Categories: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery; Health Sciences, Public Health

Abstract

Objectives: Health literacy encompasses several abilities including word recognition, reading comprehension, communication skills, and conceptual knowledge. To date, conceptual knowledge has not been included in oral health literacy research. This study assesses the validity and reliability of a new instrument and describes conceptual oral health knowledge among a sample of low-income adults. Methods: One hundred Baltimore adults were administered the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (Short-TOFHLA), and a new survey of conceptual oral health knowledge. Respondents were also asked about sociodemographics, dental health, and utilization. Results: Psychometric analysis was used to identify a subset of oral health knowledge questions from the new survey instrument. The resulting Comprehensive Measure of Oral Health Knowledge (CMOHK) was categorized into three levels of knowledge (poor, fair, good). Nearly one-third of Baltimore adults exhibited the lowest level. CMOHK scores were significantly associated with age, education level, and word recognition (REALM). CMOHK scores were not associated with reading comprehension (Short-TOFHLA) or dental care visits. Instrument reliability was good (Cronbach alpha = 0.74). Conclusions: This preliminary study yielded a new measure of oral health conceptual knowledge, available for use in future oral health literacy studies. The author presents a conceptual framework of oral health literacy that separates health literacy into four unique components and places decision-making at the center. Future studies are needed to determine whether this framework is supported by empirical data and leads to improvements in oral health and reductions in health disparities.