Publication
A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 05/20/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2021-12-15
- Publisher
- SPRINGERNATURE
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © The Author(s) 2021
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Start Page
- 1286
- End Page
- 1299
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Criteria for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and partially responsive depression (PRD) as subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) are not unequivocally defined. In the present document we used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to define TRD and PRD and to serve as operational criteria for future clinical studies, especially if conducted for regulatory purposes. We reviewed the literature and brought together a group of international experts (including clinicians, academics, researchers, employees of pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies representatives, and one person with lived experience) to evaluate the state-of-the-art and main controversies regarding the current classification. We then provided recommendations on how to design clinical trials, and on how to guide research in unmet needs and knowledge gaps. This report will feed into one of the main objectives of the EUropean Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms, Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU-PEARL, IMI) MDD project, to design a protocol for platform trials of new medications for TRD/PRD.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Pharmacology
- Engineering, Biomedical
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - vxfh4.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-19 | Public | Download |