Publication

Serotonin, Dopamine and Noradrenaline Adjust Actions of Myelinated Afferents via Modulation of Presynaptic Inhibition in the Mouse Spinal Cord

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/05/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    David L. Garcia-Ramirez, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalJorge R. Calvo, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalShawn Hochman, Emory UniversityJorge N. Quevedo, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2014-02-28
Publisher
  • Public Library of Science
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2014 Garcı´a-Ramı´rez et al.
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 1932-6203
Volume
  • 9
Issue
  • 2
Start Page
  • e89999
End Page
  • e89999
Grant/Funding Information
Abstract
  • Gain control of primary afferent neurotransmission at their intraspinal terminals occurs by several mechanisms including primary afferent depolarization (PAD). PAD produces presynaptic inhibition via a reduction in transmitter release. While it is known that descending monoaminergic pathways complexly regulate sensory processing, the extent these actions include modulation of afferent-evoked PAD remains uncertain. We investigated the effects of serotonin (5HT), dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) on afferent transmission and PAD. Responses were evoked by stimulation of myelinated hindlimb cutaneous and muscle afferents in the isolated neonatal mouse spinal cord. Monosynaptic responses were examined in the deep dorsal horn either as population excitatory synaptic responses (recorded as extracellular field potentials; EFPs) or intracellular excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). The magnitude of PAD generated intraspinally was estimated from electrotonically back-propagating dorsal root potentials (DRPs) recorded on lumbar dorsal roots. 5HT depressed the DRP by 76%. Monosynaptic actions were similarly depressed by 5HT (EFPs 54%; EPSCs 75%) but with a slower time course. This suggests that depression of monosynaptic EFPs and DRPs occurs by independent mechanisms. DA and NA had similar depressant actions on DRPs but weaker effects on EFPs. IC50 values for DRP depression were 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mM for 5HT, DA and NA, respectively. Depression of DRPs by monoamines was nearly-identical in both muscle and cutaneous afferentevoked responses, supporting a global modulation of the multimodal afferents stimulated. 5HT, DA and NA produced no change in the compound antidromic potentials evoked by intraspinal microstimulation indicating that depression of the DRP is unrelated to direct changes in the excitability of intraspinal afferent fibers, but due to metabotropic receptor activation. In summary, both myelinated afferent-evoked DRPs and monosynaptic transmission in the dorsal horn are broadly reduced by descending monoamine transmitters. These actions likely integrate with modulatory actions elsewhere to reconfigure spinal circuits during motor behaviors.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Biology, Physiology
  • Biology, Neuroscience
  • Biology, General

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items