Publication
A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 06/25/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2023-06-01
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2023 The Authors
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Start Page
- 101563
- End Page
- 101563
- Grant/Funding Information
- This work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 2023JJ60464], Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department Project [grant numbers 2018SSK2120, 2018SK2124, 2019SK2032, and 2019JJ50360], the Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province [grant numbers C2019070 and B2019089], the Changsha Science and Technology Project [grant numbers kq1901076, kq2004125 and kq2004137], the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association HER2 target Chinese Research Fund [grant number CORP-239-S5], and Climb Plan of Hunan Cancer Hospital [grant number ZX2021005].
- Supplemental Material (URL)
- Abstract
- Background: Eribulin mesylate is a novel, nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus eribulin plus the oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Patients and methods: In this single-center, open-label, phase II clinical study (NCT05206656) conducted in a Chinese hospital, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy were randomized (1 : 1) to receive eribulin alone or in combination with anlotinib. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From June 2020 to April 2022, a total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to either eribulin monotherapy or eribulin plus anlotinib combination therapy, with 40 patients in each group. The data cut-off was 10 August 2022. The median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-5.5 months] for eribulin and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.5-6.9 months) for eribulin plus anlotinib (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; P = 0.04). The objective response rates were 32.5% versus 52.5% (P = 0.07), respectively, and disease control rates were 67.5% versus 92.5% (P = 0.01), respectively. Patients <50 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, visceral metastasis, number of treatment lines of four or more, hormone receptor negative (triple-negative), and HER2 low expression appeared to benefit more from combined treatment. The most common adverse events in both groups were leukopenia (n = 28, 70.0%, patients in the eribulin monotherapy group versus n = 35, 87.5%, patients in the combination therapy group), aspartate aminotransferase elevations (n = 28, 70.0%, versus n = 35, 87.5%), neutropenia (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 31, 77.5%), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 30, 75.0%). Conclusion: Eribulin plus anlotinib can be considered an alternative treatment option for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Oncology
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w7f8t.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-06-02 | Public | Download |