Publication

Chlamydia trachomatis infection and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 05/15/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Matti Lehtinen, Tampere UniversityKevin Ault, Emory UniversityErika Lyytikainen, University of OuluJoakim Dillner, Lund UniversitySuzanne M. Garland, Royal Womens HospitallDaron G. Ferris, Medical College of GeorgiaLaura A. Koutsky, University of WashingtonHeather L. Sings, Merck Sharp & Dohme CorpShuang Lu, Merck Sharp & Dohme CorpRichard M. Haupt, Merck Sharp & Dohme CorpJorma Paavonen, University of Helsinki
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2011-08-01
Publisher
  • BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited
License
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 87
Issue
  • 5
Start Page
  • 372
End Page
  • 376
Grant/Funding Information
  • This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ.
Abstract
  • Objectives: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is the primary cause of cervical cancer. As Chlamydia trachomatis is also linked to cervical cancer, its role as a potential co-factor in the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher was examined. Methods: The placebo arms of two large, multinational, clinical trials of an HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine were combined. A total of 8441 healthy women aged 15-26 years underwent cervicovaginal cytology (Papanicolaou (Pap) testing) sampling and C trachomatis testing at day 1 and every 12 months thereafter for up to 4 years. Protocol-specified guidelines were used to triage participants with Pap abnormalities to colposcopy and definitive therapy. The main outcome measured was CIN. Results: At baseline, 2629 (31.1%) tested positive for hrHPV DNA and 354 (4.2%) tested positive for C trachomatis. Among those with HPV16/18 infection (n=965; 11.4%) or without HPV16/18 infection (n=7382, 87.5%), the hazard ratios (HRs) associated with development of any CIN grade 2 according to baseline C trachomatis status were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.06 to 3.14) and 1.74 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.90), respectively. The results were comparable when only the 12 most common hrHPV infections were considered, but the excess risk disappeared when the outcome was expanded to include CIN grade 3 or worse. Conclusion: Further studies based on larger cohorts with longitudinal follow-up in relation to the C trachomatis acquisition and a thorough evaluation of temporal relationships of infections with hrHPV types, C trachomatis and cervical neoplasia are needed to demonstrate whether and how in some situations C trachomatis sets the stage for cervical carcinogenesis. Trial registration: NCT00092521 and NCT00092534.
Author Notes
  • Matti Lehtinen, School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere 33014, Finland; llmale@uta.fl
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Health Sciences, Immunology

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items