Publication

Estimating Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2013-2016

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 10/24/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Megan G. Hofmeister, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionElizabeth M. Rosenthal, SUNY AlbanyLaurie K. Barker, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionEli Rosenberg, Emory UniversityMeredith A. Barranco, SUNY AlbanyEric W. Hall, Emory UniversityBrian R. Edlin, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionJonathan Mermin, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionJohn Ward, Emory UniversityA. Blythe Ryerson, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2019-03-01
Publisher
  • WILEY
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
Volume
  • 69
Issue
  • 3
Start Page
  • 1020
End Page
  • 1031
Grant/Funding Information
  • We acknowledge funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Epidemic and Economic Modeling Agreement (U38 PS004646).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most commonly reported bloodborne infection in the United States, causing substantial morbidity and mortality and costing billions of dollars annually. To update the estimated HCV prevalence among all adults aged ≥18 years in the United States, we analyzed 2013-2016 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the prevalence of HCV in the noninstitutionalized civilian population and used a combination of literature reviews and population size estimation approaches to estimate the HCV prevalence and population sizes for four additional populations: incarcerated people, unsheltered homeless people, active-duty military personnel, and nursing home residents. We estimated that during 2013-2016 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.0%) of all adults in the United States, approximately 4.1 (3.4-4.9) million persons, were HCV antibody-positive (indicating past or current infection) and that 1.0% (95% CI, 0.8-1.1%) of all adults, approximately 2.4 (2.0-2.8) million persons, were HCV RNA–positive (indicating current infection). This includes 3.7 million noninstitutionalized civilian adults in the United States with HCV antibodies and 2.1 million with HCV RNA and an estimated 0.38 million HCV antibody-positive persons and 0.25 million HCV RNA–positive persons not part of the 2013-2016 NHANES sampling frame. Conclusion: Over 2 million people in the United States had current HCV infection during 2013-2016; compared to past estimates based on similar methodology, HCV antibody prevalence may have increased, while RNA prevalence may have decreased, likely reflecting the combination of the opioid crisis, curative treatment for HCV infection, and mortality among the HCV-infected population; efforts on multiple fronts are needed to combat the evolving HCV epidemic, including increasing capacity for and access to HCV testing, linkage to care, and cure.
  • We appreciate Dr. Spaulding and colleagues’ thoughtful commentary on our article. We used national data to provide the most accurate estimate possible of the prevalence of hepatitis C among adults in the United States, but our estimate was dependent on the quality and completeness of the available data. We corrected for the omission of several high-prevalence populations from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), but no nationally representative studies of these populations exist. Spaulding and her colleagues raise a number of reasons why our study may underestimate the true prevalence of hepatitis C among incarcerated persons, but unfortunately, no nationwide data exist to assess the magnitude of these potential biases. According to 2016 Bureau of Justice Statistics data, most people arrested are detained in jails for short periods of time(1); thus, most of the number of persons cited in Dr. Spaulding’s reply would be eligible for NHANES sampling. We could not further adjust estimates for potential nonresponse bias beyond those addressed through standard NHANES sample weights without risk of double-counting prevalent cases.
Author Notes
  • Megan G. Hofmeister, MD, MS, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS G-37, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone: (404) 718-5458, Fax: (404) 718-8588, lxn7@cdc.gov
  • Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
  • Reply to commentary from Dr. Spaulding and colleagues: Letter to the Editor: Hepatitis C Virus Prevalence Estimates Among Incarcerated Persons https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30636
Keywords

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items