Publication
Physiology-Based Revascularization: A New Approach to Plan and Optimize Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Downloadable Content
- Persistent URL
- Last modified
- 07/03/2025
- Type of Material
- Authors
- Language
- English
- Date
- 2021-06-01
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Publication Version
- Copyright Statement
- © 2021 The Authors
- License
- Final Published Version (URL)
- Title of Journal or Parent Work
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Start Page
- 14
- End Page
- 36
- Grant/Funding Information
- Dr. Joo Myung Lee has received a research grant from Abbott Vascular and Philips Volcano; and has received consulting fees from RainMed
- Dr. Matsuo has received institutional research support by Phillips; and has received consulting fees from Zeon Medical. Dr. Koo has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular and Philips Volcano.
- Dr. Fearon has received institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has been a consultant with CathWorks and with HeartFlow.
- Abstract
- Coronary physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratios has become a standard of care for patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. However, most evidence has focused on the pre-interventional use of physiological assessment to aid revascularization decision-making, whereas post-interventional physiological assessment has not been well established. Although evidence for supporting the role of post-interventional physiological assessment to optimize immediate revascularization results and long-term prognosis has been reported, a more thorough understanding of these data is crucial in incorporating post-interventional physiological assessment into daily practice. Recent scientific efforts have also focused on the potential role of pre-interventional fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratio pullback tracings to characterize patterns of coronary atherosclerotic disease to better predict post-interventional physiological outcomes, and thereby identify the appropriate revascularization target. Pre-interventional pullback tracings with dedicated post-processing methods can provide characterization of focal versus diffuse disease or major gradient versus minor gradient stenosis, which would result in different post-interventional physiological results. This review provides a comprehensive look at the current evidence regarding the evolving role of physiological assessment as a functional optimization tool for the entire process of revascularization, and not merely as a pre-interventional tool for revascularization decision-making.
- Author Notes
- Keywords
- VOCE, vessel-related composite event
- HR, hazard ratio
- prognosis
- PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
- iFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio
- nonhyperemic pressure ratios
- DES, drug-eluting stent(s)
- CI, confidence interval
- NHPR, nonhyperemic pressure ratio
- MACE, major adverse cardiac event(s)
- FFR, fractional flow reserve
- TVF, target vessel failure
- fractional flow reserve
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- instantaneous wave-free ratio
- Research Categories
- Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
Tools
- Download Item
- Contact Us
-
Citation Management Tools
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | File Description | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Publication File - w3qsf.pdf | Primary Content | 2025-05-29 | Public | Download |