Publication

Evaluation of a data fusion approach to estimate daily PM2.5 levels in North China

Downloadable Content

Persistent URL
Last modified
  • 03/03/2025
Type of Material
Authors
    Fengchao Liang, Emory UniversityMeng Gao, University of IowaQingyang Xiao, Emory UniversityGregory R. Carmichael, University of IowaXiaochuan Pan, Peking UniversityYang Liu, Emory University
Language
  • English
Date
  • 2017-10-01
Publisher
  • Elsevier
Publication Version
Copyright Statement
  • © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Final Published Version (URL)
Title of Journal or Parent Work
ISSN
  • 0013-9351
Volume
  • 158
Start Page
  • 54
End Page
  • 60
Grant/Funding Information
  • The work of F. Liang at Emory University as a visiting student was supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC).
  • The work of Y. Liu was partially supported by the NASA Applied Sciences Program (grant NNX14AG01G) and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (contract # 1558091).
  • The work of M. Gao and G. R. Carmichael were supported by the NASA Applied Sciences Program (grant NNX11AI52G) and EPA STAR program (RD-83503701).
  • The work of X. Pan was supported by the Natural Sciences Foundations of China (No. 81273033 and No. 81372950).
Supplemental Material (URL)
Abstract
  • PM 2.5 air pollution has been a growing concern worldwide. Previous studies have conducted several techniques to estimate PM 2.5 exposure spatiotemporally in China, but all these have limitations. This study was to develop a data fusion approach and compare it with kriging and Chemistry Module. Two techniques were applied to create daily spatial cover of PM 2.5 in grid cells with a resolution of 10 km in North China in 2013, respectively, which was kriging with an external drift (KED) and Weather Research and Forecast Model with Chemistry Module (WRF-Chem). A data fusion technique was developed by fusing PM 2.5 concentration predicted by KED and WRF-Chem, accounting for the distance from the central of grid cell to the nearest ground observations and daily spatial correlations between WRF-Chem and observations. Model performances were evaluated by comparing them with ground observations and the spatial prediction errors. KED and data fusion performed better at monitoring sites with a daily model R 2 of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively and PM 2.5 was overestimated by WRF-Chem (R 2 =0.51). KED and data fusion performed better around the ground monitors, WRF-Chem performed relative worse with high prediction errors in the central of study domain. In our study, both KED and data fusion technique provided highly accurate PM 2.5 . Current monitoring network in North China was dense enough to provide a reliable PM 2.5 prediction by interpolation technique.
Author Notes
Keywords
Research Categories
  • Health Sciences, Public Health
  • Health Sciences, Occupational Health and Safety
  • Environmental Sciences

Tools

Relations

In Collection:

Items